DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
29904-2490
ARLINGTON, VA 22204
.
This is correctiol £ your naval
record 1
A three-member panel of the Board for Records,
v sion, consid 1 OI
r od
sitting in executive sessl
llegations of
=
istrative regul
25 March 2015. Your a
in accordance with admi
in ini
e to the proceedings of th
S
red by the Board consi
= c si 5
n Pp syeof, your naval 2 A
In add on the
furnished by NPC memo Se
a copy of which is attached
A 1
, a copy of Whlcli
opinion. Acc
1d votes
Lon.
Board prior to
om the
s evidence not previously
decision in your case. In s important to |!
r
mind that a presumption of
records.
Docket No. NR8151-14
an official naval
Consequently, when applying for 4 correction of
the existence of
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate
probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ALAA ~
Viw) Ofte
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
Enclosure: NPC memo 1430 Ser 812/0040 dtd 15 Dec 14
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8557 14
R three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 March 2015. Documenta considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 05214-98
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 12 and 16 April 1999, copies of which are attached. Until 1 September 1995, as a member of the Ready Reserve, and as such, W= be considered by promotion - - selection boards. A complete review of Lieutenant Commander record reveals that there were no properly considered during either failure of selection per reference (c).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5257 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 December 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo dated 17 September 2013, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4761 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 December 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo dated 23 September 2013, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9805214
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 12 and 16 April 1999, copies of which are attached. Per reference (b), lieutenant commanders in an active status who have at least twice failed of selection and have attained 20 years of actual commissioned service must be retired or separated from the Naval Reserve. Director, Naval Reserve Personnel Administration Division
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00359-99
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 4 May 1999 with enclosure, a copy of which is attached. requested continuation in an active status in 2. captai- order to be considered by the FY-00 Naval Reserve 0-7 Line Promotion Board which convened on 8 February 1999. NPC-911 is responsible for Naval Reserve Continuation Boards.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9941 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 2 eHAperctic ‘ ocr yo BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 Docket No. Document considered by the Board i of your application, all material submitted in support thereof, your naval 1 applicable statutes, regulations and policies In add considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1 812/0361 dated 19 November 2015, a copy of which is att 3 contained in the review oi your military records, nothing was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02778-00
You alleged that your spot promotion correspondence was mailed for consideration by the FY 00 First Quarter Spot Selection Board, convened on 5 November 1999. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 April 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3978 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR3978-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11880-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 February 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...